Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2018-10-26 | 2016-09-01 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XR is a bit better than Moto Z Force, with a overall score of 82 against 75.8. The iPhone XR construction is way newer than Moto Z Force's, although it's heavier and thicker. Motorola Moto Z Force features a bit better display than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a much better count of pixels per screen inch and a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2560.
IPhone XR has a quite superior performance than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a greater number of cores and a 64 bits processor. The iPhone XR features a little bit better camera than Moto Z Force, although it has a back facing camera with a much lower 12 MP resolution and a lower (4K) video quality, they both have a F1.8 aperture.
Motorola Moto Z Force has a very superior memory to install applications and games than iPhone XR, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the Motorola Moto Z Force also has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola Moto Z Force features a bit superior battery duration than iPhone XR, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone XR is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola Moto Z Force. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Apple iPhone XR, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Motorola Moto Z Force, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.