Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| 2018-10-26 | 2017-08-10 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XR has a global score of 82, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition's 77.4 score. The Apple iPhone XR design is newer, but notably heavier and much thicker than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition. IPhone XR features a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has lesser CPU cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
The Moto Z2 Force Edition features a little bit better display than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a much higher display pixel density and a much better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. The iPhone XR shoots clearer videos and photos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and a 12 mega pixels resolution back camera, the iPhone XR also has a larger aperture, better 60 fps video frame rates and a bigger camera sensor taking higher quality videos and photos.
The Moto Z2 Force Edition has a superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than iPhone XR, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Moto Z2 Force Edition also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB. The iPhone XR counts with a bit longer battery performance than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 2942mAh battery size.
The Apple iPhone XR is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also cheaper than the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.