Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2018-10-26 | 2018-08-16 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XR is just a bit better than Motorola Moto Z3, having a overall score of 82 against 77.6. The iPhone XR body is somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker than the Motorola Moto Z3. IPhone XR features a bit better processor than Moto Z3, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and less cpu cores , it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
Apple iPhone XR has just a bit better looking screen than Moto Z3, because although it has a just a little worse pixel count per inch in the screen and a lot lower 828 x 1792 resolution, it also counts with a bit bigger screen. The Apple iPhone XR features just a bit better camera than Moto Z3, and although they both have a 12 MP resolution back-facing camera and the same (4K) video resolution, the Apple iPhone XR also has faster 60 frames per second video frame rates, a larger back-facing camera sensor providing a better image quality and a larger aperture to take better low light photography.
The Moto Z3 has much more storage for applications and games than iPhone XR, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Moto Z3 also has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. Moto Z3's battery life is just as good as the battery life in iPhone XR, although the Moto Z3 also has a 3000mAh battery size.
Although iPhone XR is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola Moto Z3, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Moto Z3. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the iPhone XR, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Motorola Moto Z3, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.