Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| 2018-10-26 | 2018-06-29 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 10.26 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XR is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto Z3 Play, with a score of 82 against 76.3. Although it's the best phone in this review, we must highlight that it's also somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier. The iPhone XR has a more powerful processing unit than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and 2 lesser processing cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
IPhone XR has a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a quite worse pixels density and a lot lower resolution of 828 x 1792 pixels, it also counts with a bit bigger screen. IPhone XR has a slightly better camera than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the same back-facing camera sensor size and a same resolution camera in the back, the iPhone XR also counts with faster 60 frames per second video frame rate.
Moto Z3 Play counts with a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Apple iPhone XR, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Moto Z3 Play also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. Motorola Moto Z3 Play and iPhone XR both have similar battery performance, although the Motorola Moto Z3 Play also has a 3000mAh battery capacity against 2942mAh.
The iPhone XR is a lot more expensive than Moto Z3 Play, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.