Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-10-26 | 2019-12-04 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 324 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XR is slightly better than the Motorola One Hyper, getting an 82 score against 79.8. Although the Apple iPhone XR is older than Motorola One Hyper, it's design is a bit lighter and just a little thinner. IPhone XR has a faster processing unit than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a lower number of cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit processor.
The iPhone XR has a little more vivid display than Motorola One Hyper, although it has a quite inferior quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, a bit smaller display and a much lower 828 x 1792 resolution. The Motorola One Hyper counts with a way bigger memory to store more apps and games than iPhone XR, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB.
Motorola One Hyper takes much clearer videos and photos than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a tinier aperture which is not good for low light photography, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Motorola One Hyper features superior battery duration than iPhone XR, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 2942mAh.
Although iPhone XR is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola One Hyper, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola One Hyper. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy iPhone XR, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Motorola One Hyper, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.