Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| 2018-10-26 | 2019-09-05 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XR is a little bit better than the Motorola One Zoom, getting a global score of 82 against 80. The Apple iPhone XR is an older and just a little heavier cellphone than the Motorola One Zoom, but Apple was able to build it just a bit thinner anyway. The iPhone XR counts with a greater processing power than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has lesser CPU cores (but faster) and 1 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
The iPhone XR counts with a bit more vivid display than Motorola One Zoom, although it has a little less pixels per inch of screen, a way worse 828 x 1792 resolution and a little smaller screen. The Motorola One Zoom shoots better pictures and videos than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola One Zoom also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor taking much higher quality videos and photographs, a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light images and video and a camera with way more mega pixels.
Motorola One Zoom features a superior memory for apps and games than iPhone XR, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 128 GB and more internal storage. The Motorola One Zoom features longer battery lifetime than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Although iPhone XR is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola One Zoom, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola One Zoom. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy the Motorola One Zoom, giving up a couple features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.