Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Nokia |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-10-26 | 2020-11-12 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | Meteor grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LCD |
| 324 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XR is a bit better than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, getting a overall score of 82 against 80.3. The Apple iPhone XR body is somewhat lighter and a bit thinner than the Nokia 8 V 5G UW, even though it was released many years before. IPhone XR has a better performing processing unit than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores (but faster), it also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
The iPhone XR features just a bit better looking display than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, although it has a way lower resolution of 828 x 1792 pixels, a little bit smaller display and a quite worse display pixels density. Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a lot better camera than Apple iPhone XR, and although they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 video quality and a same size aperture, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has a back camera with a much better resolution and a much larger camera sensor shooting much higher quality photos.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW features a lot bigger storage to store more games and applications than Apple iPhone XR, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. Nokia 8 V 5G UW features a superior battery performance than Apple iPhone XR, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 2942mAh.
The iPhone XR is a little more expensive than the Nokia 8 V 5G UW, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.