Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-10-26 | 2019-10-16 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | Cyber shade |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XR is a bit better than nubia Red Magic 3S, with an 82 score against 75.8. The iPhone XR is an older device than nubia Red Magic 3S, but Apple could make it thinner and just a little lighter. The Apple iPhone XR features a bit better CPU than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and 2 less and slower CPU cores, it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
The iPhone XR has a little more vivid display than nubia Red Magic 3S, although it has a just a bit lower display density, a lot worse resolution of 828 x 1792px and a little smaller screen. Nubia Red Magic 3S shoots better videos and photos than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a lot more megapixels back-facing camera, a bigger diafragm aperture, a lot better 7680x4320 video quality and a way larger sensor taking much higher quality pictures and videos.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a much greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Apple iPhone XR, because it has 256 GB internal storage. The nubia Red Magic 3S features a much longer battery lifetime than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 2942mAh.
IPhone XR costs more money than nubia Red Magic 3S, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.