Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2018-10-26 | 2021-12-03 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 324 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A13 5G is slightly better than Apple iPhone XR, having a global score of 82.1 against 82. Galaxy A13 5G's construction is noticeably newer than Apple iPhone XR's, but it's just a little bit thicker and a bit heavier. The iPhone XR features a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 828 x 1792px and a quite higher display density.
The Apple iPhone XR counts with a superior performance than Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bits CPU. The Galaxy A13 5G counts with a bit better camera than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same (Full HD) video quality and the same aperture, the Galaxy A13 5G also counts with a much better resolution back camera.
IPhone XR and Galaxy A13 5G count with incredibly similar memory for applications, games, photos and videos, both of them have exactly the same internal memory. The Galaxy A13 5G has a way better battery performance than iPhone XR, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2942mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.