Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-10-26 | 2023-12-16 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | Blue Black and Light Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 10.26 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XR is slightly better than Galaxy A15 5G, having a overall score of 82 against 77.4. The iPhone XR is a just a little lighter cellphone than the Galaxy A15 5G, but both are 0.33inches thick. IPhone XR has a very superior processing power than Galaxy A15 5G, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G has a little sharper display than Apple iPhone XR, because it has more display brightness, a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen, a better resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a quite larger display. The Galaxy A15 5G shoots a bit better videos and photos than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have the same aperture and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Galaxy A15 5G also counts with a lot more mega-pixels back camera.
Galaxy A15 5G counts with a much bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone XR, because it has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1000 GB and more internal storage. Galaxy A15 5G has a very superior battery life than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 2942mAh.
Although iPhone XR is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy A15 5G. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the iPhone XR, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.