Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-10-26 | 2020-06-19 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.44 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 324 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Mali-G76 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 9.84 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XR has a global score of 82, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A21s's 77.7 overall score. Despite of the fact iPhone XR is older and just a little bit heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A21s, it's body is still a little bit thinner. The iPhone XR features a better performing processor than Samsung Galaxy A21s, because although it has a lower number of cores (although faster), and they both have 3 GB of RAM, the iPhone XR also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
Apple iPhone XR features a much better screen than Galaxy A21s, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher pixels quantity per inch in the screen and a quite better resolution of 828 x 1792px. Galaxy A21s counts with a little bit better camera than iPhone XR, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for taking photos or videos in low-light environments and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same (Full HD) video definition, the Galaxy A21s also counts with a back camera with a much better 48 mega pixels resolution and a much larger camera sensor providing a way higher image quality.
Galaxy A21s has a much better memory capacity for applications and games than iPhone XR, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy A21s counts with a much longer battery duration than iPhone XR, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.