Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-10-26 | 2021-06-24 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 324 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is slightly better than iPhone XR, having a overall score of 84.6 against 82. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G's body is extremely newer, but just a little heavier and a little thicker than the iPhone XR. The iPhone XR has a bit better display than Galaxy A22 5G, although it has a little smaller display, a bit less pixels per inch in the display and a way lower resolution of 828 x 1792 pixels.
The Galaxy A22 5G features a much better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone XR, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy A22 5G also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1 TB. The iPhone XR features a more powerful CPU than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
Galaxy A22 5G counts with just a bit better camera than iPhone XR, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have a same size aperture and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Galaxy A22 5G also counts with a camera in the back with much more MP. Galaxy A22 5G counts with a much better battery duration than Apple iPhone XR, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.