Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-10-26 | 2023-12-11 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 10.26 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XR is just a bit better than Galaxy A25 5G, having an 82 score against 79.9. The Apple iPhone XR construction has the same thickness than Galaxy A25 5G, but it's just a little lighter. Apple iPhone XR has a much better performing processor than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores (although faster), it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
Galaxy A25 5G features a bit better display than iPhone XR, because it has much more brightness, a little bigger display, a just a little higher screen pixel density and a higher 1080 x 2340 resolution. The Galaxy A25 5G has a much better memory capacity for applications and games than iPhone XR, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1 TB and more internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a really longer battery performance than iPhone XR, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. Galaxy A25 5G shoots slightly better pictures and videos than iPhone XR, because although it has worse video frame rate and a tinier sensor taking less light and washed colors, and they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a lot better resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.