Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2018-10-26 | 2022-04-22 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.29 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.6 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Yes GPU |
| 10.26 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XR has a score of 82, which is a bit better than Galaxy A33 5G's global score of 77.8. IPhone XR's body is way older, a little thicker and a little heavier than the Galaxy A33 5G. The iPhone XR has a lot better hardware performance than Galaxy A33 5G, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
The iPhone XR has a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A33 5G, although it has a lot lower resolution of 828 x 1792, a bit less pixels per inch of screen and a quite smaller screen. The iPhone XR captures a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A33 5G, although it has a camera with a way worse resolution, they both have the same diafragm aperture.
The Samsung Galaxy A33 5G counts with much more storage for applications and games than Apple iPhone XR, because it has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB and more internal storage. The Galaxy A33 5G features a way better battery life than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a 70% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.