Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2018-10-26 | -- |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 6.84 ounces | -- |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A34 is slightly better than iPhone XR, getting a overall score of 82.9 against 82. Galaxy A34 is a way lighter and way thinner phone than iPhone XR. The iPhone XR has a little bit better performance than Galaxy A34, because although it has a lower number of cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
Apple iPhone XR features just a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A34, although it has a quite lower display pixel density, a lot worse resolution of 828 x 1792 pixels and a bit smaller display. The iPhone XR has just a bit better camera than Galaxy A34, although it has a back facing camera with lot less mega pixels and a much tinier back-facing camera sensor shooting lot worse quality videos and photos, they both have a same size diafragm aperture.
IPhone XR and Galaxy A34 count with very similar memory capacity for games and applications, they have exactly the same internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A34 features a way better battery performance than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a 70 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.