Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-10-26 | 2024-03-11 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 10.26 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XR is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, getting an 82 score against 79.4. The Apple iPhone XR is a older and just a bit thicker cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, but Apple made it a little lighter anyway. IPhone XR counts with a much greater hardware performance than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has 2 lesser cores (but faster) and 3 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
Galaxy A35 5G features a little more vivid display than iPhone XR, because although it has way darker screen, it also counts with a little bit bigger display, a higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a little greater pixels amount per inch of display. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G counts with a way bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone XR, because it has 128 GB internal storage.
The Galaxy A35 5G has a very superior battery performance than iPhone XR, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 2942mAh. The Galaxy A35 5G takes better photos and videos than iPhone XR, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing way higher quality pictures and videos and a back camera with lot more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.