Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-10-26 | 2020-05-15 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XR is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A41, with a overall score of 82 against 81.7. Although it's the best in our current comparison, the iPhone XR body is older, a little thicker and noticeably heavier than Samsung Galaxy A41. The Apple iPhone XR features a better performing processor than Samsung Galaxy A41, because although it has lesser RAM and 2 lesser processing cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
The Apple iPhone XR and the Samsung Galaxy A41 feature extremely similar screens, and although the Samsung Galaxy A41 has a higher pixels count in each inch of display and a higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, they both have a screen with the same size. Galaxy A41 counts with a much greater storage for applications and games than iPhone XR, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Galaxy A41 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy A41 has a superior camera than iPhone XR, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate and a tinier aperture which is not good for taking photos in low light environments, and they both have the same video quality, the Galaxy A41 also counts with a back facing camera with a much better resolution and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing much higher quality videos and photos.
Galaxy A41 counts with just a bit longer battery duration than iPhone XR, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.