Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-10-26 | 2019-10-20 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s is just a bit better than the Apple iPhone XR, getting a global score of 86.6 against 82. Galaxy A50s is a newer phone, and it is also lighter and just a bit thinner than Apple iPhone XR. Apple iPhone XR has a bit superior processor than Galaxy A50s, because although it has a lower number of cores and lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
The Apple iPhone XR counts with a bit better display than Galaxy A50s, although it has a little bit lower pixel density, a way worse resolution of 828 x 1792 and a quite smaller display. Samsung Galaxy A50s has a much better camera than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for shooting photographs and videos in poorly lited environments and lower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also counts with a way bigger sensor capturing lot higher quality pictures and a back facing camera with a lot better resolution.
Galaxy A50s counts with a superior storage for apps and games than iPhone XR, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with improved battery life than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a 36 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.