Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-10-26 | 2020-04-29 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 5G has an overall score of 90.8, which is better than iPhone XR's global score of 82. Even though the Galaxy A51 5G is a little bit thicker than iPhone XR, it's a little bit lighter and newer. The Apple iPhone XR counts with a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch in the display, a bit smaller screen and a way worse 828 x 1792 pixels resolution.
Apple iPhone XR counts with a quite superior processing power than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has less RAM memory and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64 bits CPU. Galaxy A51 5G has a better camera than iPhone XR, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light images and videos and lower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a way larger camera sensor which gives a lot better image and video quality and a lot more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Galaxy A51 5G features a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than iPhone XR, because it has an external SD slot that admits up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a superior battery lifetime than iPhone XR, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is also a bargain compared to others, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.