Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2018-10-26 | 2021-03-19 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G is better than the Apple iPhone XR, having a 91.3 score against 82. The Galaxy A52 5G body has the same thickness than Apple iPhone XR, but it is just a bit lighter. IPhone XR has a bit sharper display than Galaxy A52 5G, although it has a just a bit inferior quantity of pixels per inch in the display, a lot lower 828 x 1792 resolution and a little bit smaller display.
The iPhone XR has a superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has lesser RAM memory and an inferior number of cores (but faster), it also counts with a 64 bits processor. The Galaxy A52 5G has a much bigger memory capacity for apps and games than iPhone XR, because it has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB and 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a much better battery duration than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 2942mAh. Galaxy A52 5G captures much clearer photographs and videos than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have a same size camera aperture and the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a much larger sensor which provides a lot higher photo and video quality and a lot more mega-pixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.