Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-10-26 | 2021-09-01 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52s is much better than iPhone XR, getting a score of 91.1 against 82. Galaxy A52s's construction has the same thickness than the iPhone XR, but it is a little lighter. Apple iPhone XR counts with a little bit better performance than Galaxy A52s, because although it has a lower number of cores (but faster) and lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
IPhone XR counts with a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A52s, although it has a quite lower screen pixel density, a lot lower 828 x 1792 resolution and a little smaller screen. Galaxy A52s counts with a much better camera than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have a same size aperture and the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A52s also counts with a lot bigger sensor taking way better quality videos and pictures and a back camera with a way better 64 megapixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A52s features a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone XR, because it has an external memory card slot that admits up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage. The Galaxy A52s has a way better battery life than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.