Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| 2018-10-26 | 2018-05-22 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 10.26 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
IPhone XR is just a bit better than Galaxy A6, with a score of 82 against 75.8. Despite being the best in this comparison review, the iPhone XR is an a little bit thicker and heavier phone than Galaxy A6. The iPhone XR counts with a better performance than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the iPhone XR also counts with a 64 bits processor.
Apple iPhone XR counts with a better looking display than Galaxy A6, because it has a bit higher resolution of 828 x 1792 pixels, a bit bigger screen and a just a little higher display pixels density. Apple iPhone XR features just a bit better camera than Galaxy A6, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low light captures and a much less mega pixels resolution camera, it also counts with a much better (4K) video definition and a bigger back camera sensor providing a better image quality.
The Galaxy A6 counts with a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than iPhone XR, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 400 GB. Samsung Galaxy A6 features a battery lifetime that's just as good as the iPhone XR one, although the Samsung Galaxy A6 also has a 3000mAh battery size instead of 2942mAh.
Although iPhone XR is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy A6. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get Galaxy A6, letting go some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.