Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-10-26 | 2019-04-26 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
IPhone XR is a bit better than Galaxy A70, getting a general score of 82 against 76.9. IPhone XR's design is a little bit heavier and just a bit thicker than Galaxy A70. Apple iPhone XR has a little bit better screen than Galaxy A70, although it has a lot worse 828 x 1792 resolution, a bit lower pixels density and a bit smaller screen.
Samsung Galaxy A70 has a superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone XR, because it has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB and 64 GB more internal memory capacity. The iPhone XR features a superior processor than Galaxy A70, because although it has an inferior number of cores (but faster) and 3 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit processor.
Apple iPhone XR counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for low-light photos, and they both have the same video definition, the Apple iPhone XR also counts with a larger camera sensor capturing better quality videos and photographs and higher 60 fps video frame rate.
Samsung Galaxy A70 has a superior battery lifetime than Apple iPhone XR, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Although iPhone XR is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Galaxy A70, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy A70. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy iPhone XR, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Galaxy A70, resigning a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.