Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-10-26 | 2020-07-16 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | Prism bricks black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 324 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a global score of 92.9, which is better than the iPhone XR's score of 82. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW design has the same thickness than iPhone XR, but it's a little lighter. The Apple iPhone XR has a little more vivid display than Galaxy A71 5G UW, although it has a little smaller screen, a just a bit lower pixels density and a lot worse 828 x 1792 resolution.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than iPhone XR, because it has an external memory slot that holds up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. IPhone XR features a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bit processor.
Galaxy A71 5G UW has a greater camera than iPhone XR, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a back-facing camera with way more megapixels and a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking much better quality photographs.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a much longer battery lifetime than iPhone XR, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 2942mAh.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is not only the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also cheaper than the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.