Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 80.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2018-10-26 | -- |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | -- |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Yes GPU |
| 10.26 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XR is just a bit better than the Galaxy A73 5G, getting a general score of 82 against 80.5. Even being the best in this review, the iPhone XR is a a bit thicker and a little heavier cellphone than the Galaxy A73 5G. The iPhone XR features a really superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A73 5G, because although it has a lower number of cores and 3 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
Samsung Galaxy A73 5G has a slightly better looking display than iPhone XR, because it has a just a bit higher pixel density, a brighter screen, a quite larger screen and a higher 1080 x 2400px resolution. Galaxy A73 5G features a much bigger memory for applications and games than iPhone XR, because it has 64 GB more internal memory and an external memory slot that supports up to 1 TB.
Galaxy A73 5G has a much longer battery life than Apple iPhone XR, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2942mAh. Samsung Galaxy A73 5G captures slightly better videos and photos than Apple iPhone XR, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G also has a lot higher resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.