Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2018-10-26 | 2022-03-22 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | -- |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | Aqua Blue and Forest Green |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2408 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 324 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F23 is a bit better than Apple iPhone XR, getting a overall score of 84.6 against 82. Apple iPhone XR features a better performing CPU than Samsung Galaxy F23, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM memory and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit. The iPhone XR features a little bit better looking display than Galaxy F23, although it has a little bit lower pixels amount per display inch, a way lower resolution of 828 x 1792px and a little bit smaller screen.
Galaxy F23 features a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Apple iPhone XR, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity. Apple iPhone XR captures a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy F23, although it has a way worse 12 mega-pixels resolution camera, they both have a F1.8 aperture.
The Galaxy F23 has a much better battery lifetime than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.