Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-10-26 | 2020-10-16 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F41 is a bit better than Apple iPhone XR, with an 85.2 score against 82. Even though the Samsung Galaxy F41 is a little bit thicker than Apple iPhone XR, it's just a little bit lighter and also newer. Galaxy F41 counts with a bit more vivid screen than iPhone XR, because although it has much worse brightness, it also counts with a better 1080 x 2340px resolution, a little bigger display and a just a little more pixels per inch of screen.
The iPhone XR features a little better hardware performance than Galaxy F41, because although it has 3 GB lesser RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bit processor. Galaxy F41 counts with a better camera than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy F41 also counts with a way more mega-pixels back facing camera and a lot bigger sensor taking much higher quality videos and photographs.
The Samsung Galaxy F41 features a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than iPhone XR, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy F41 also has an external memory slot that holds up to 512 GB. Galaxy F41 features a very superior battery duration than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a 104% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.