Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-10-26 | 2021-02-22 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 324 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 is a bit better than the Apple iPhone XR, getting a general score of 88.1 against 82. The Samsung Galaxy F62 is a incredibly newer cellphone than Apple iPhone XR, although it's somewhat heavier and thicker. The iPhone XR counts with a greater performance than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a larger number of cores (but slower) and a 64-bits processor.
Samsung Galaxy F62 has a little more vivid display than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has way more opaque screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1080 x 2400, a little bit bigger display and a little bit greater pixels count in each inch in the display. The Galaxy F62 features a lot bigger storage for applications and games than iPhone XR, because it has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1 TB and more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy F62 has a superior battery life than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a 138% larger battery size. The Galaxy F62 counts with a much better camera than iPhone XR, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and a same size camera aperture, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a lot more MP camera in the back and a much larger sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.