Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-10-26 | 2019-09-27 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is much better than the Apple iPhone XR, getting a 97.6 score against 82. Samsung Galaxy Fold's design is newer and somewhat thinner, but incredibly heavier than the Apple iPhone XR. Apple iPhone XR counts with a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Fold, although it has a bit smaller display, a way worse resolution of 828 x 1792 pixels and a little bit lower pixels density.
Galaxy Fold has a much greater storage for games and applications than iPhone XR, because it has 512 GB internal memory. IPhone XR features a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and a lower number of cores and also slower, it also counts with a 64-bit processor.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold features a really longer battery lifetime than Apple iPhone XR, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity. Galaxy Fold captures clearer pictures and videos than iPhone XR, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, a 0.39 inches sensor and the same resolution back facing camera, the Galaxy Fold also has a bigger camera aperture to capture better images in low-light environments.
Samsung Galaxy Fold costs a lot more than Apple iPhone XR, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.