Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-10-26 | 2021-03-18 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 7.80 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | Black, blue and white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | PLS |
| 324 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Mali-G52 MP1 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XR has a general score of 82, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy M12's general score of 80. The iPhone XR is an noticeably older phone than Samsung Galaxy M12, but it is thinner and lighter anyway. Apple iPhone XR features a sharper display than Galaxy M12, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little higher display density and a little higher resolution of 828 x 1792.
Galaxy M12 counts with a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than iPhone XR, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Galaxy M12 also has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1 TB. The iPhone XR features a superior processor than Samsung Galaxy M12, because although it has 1 GB less RAM and lesser processing cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
Samsung Galaxy M12 features a really longer battery duration than iPhone XR, because it has a 104% greater battery size. The Galaxy M12 captures slightly better pictures and videos than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates and a tinier aperture which is not good for low-light photos, and they both have the same video quality, the Galaxy M12 also counts with a back facing camera with a much better 48 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.