Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2018-10-26 | 2019-02-05 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 324 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 10.26 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XR is a bit better than the Galaxy M20, getting an 82 score against 78.9. Even though Apple iPhone XR and Galaxy M20 were released with only 3 months difference, Apple iPhone XR's construction is a little bit thinner but just a little heavier. Apple iPhone XR has a little more vivid display than Galaxy M20, although it has a much lower 828 x 1792px resolution, a little bit smaller display and a just a bit less pixels per inch of screen.
The Galaxy M20 features a much greater memory capacity for applications and games than iPhone XR, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the Galaxy M20 also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 512 GB. IPhone XR has a more powerful processor than Galaxy M20, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and lesser CPU cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
Apple iPhone XR takes much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a camera in the back with a worse 12 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger sensor providing a higher image quality, a bigger aperture and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy M20 has a really longer battery lifetime than iPhone XR, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.