Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2018-10-26 | 2022-04-07 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.48 x 3.03 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 900 MT6877 (6 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 10.26 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XR has an overall score of 82, which is a bit better than the Galaxy M53 5G's score of 76.7. Although it's the best phone in this comparison review, the iPhone XR design is much older, just a bit heavier and thicker than Galaxy M53 5G. The iPhone XR features a lot better processing power than Samsung Galaxy M53 5G, because although it has lesser cpu cores and 3 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
Apple iPhone XR has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy M53 5G, although it has a way worse resolution of 828 x 1792 pixels, a little smaller screen and a just a bit lower pixels density. The Galaxy M53 5G counts with a much bigger storage to store more games and applications than iPhone XR, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy M53 5G counts with just a bit better camera than iPhone XR, because although it has a much tinier back-facing camera sensor taking lot lower quality videos and pictures, and they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Galaxy M53 5G also counts with a lot better resolution back facing camera.
Galaxy M53 5G counts with a way better battery duration than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 2942mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.