Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-10-26 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than the Apple iPhone XR, with a 98.9 score against 82. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a newer and a bit thinner cellphone than Apple iPhone XR, although it is a little heavier. Apple iPhone XR counts with a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores and they are also slower, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit better screen than iPhone XR, because it has a way higher 1440 x 3088 resolution, a little bigger screen and a way better display pixels density. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots much better photos and videos than Apple iPhone XR, and although they both have the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a lot larger sensor, a lot more megapixels back facing camera and a way higher video resolution.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than iPhone XR, because it has more internal storage and a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a very superior battery performance than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way more expensive than Apple iPhone XR, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.