Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| 2018-10-26 | 2014-09-29 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | Black, Gold, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Mali-T760 MP6 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XR is just a bit better than the Galaxy Note4, getting an 82 score against 77.6. The Apple iPhone XR is a just a little heavier device than Galaxy Note4, but they are 0.33inches thick. The Apple iPhone XR counts with a quite better performance than Galaxy Note4, because although it has lesser cpu cores , and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Apple iPhone XR also counts with a 64-bits processor.
Samsung Galaxy Note4 counts with a little more vivid screen than iPhone XR, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a way better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a way greater display pixels density. The iPhone XR captures clearer videos and photos than Galaxy Note4, because although it has a much less mega-pixels back-facing camera and a lower 3840x2160 video definition, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture for better captures in low-light environments and a bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Samsung Galaxy Note4 features a bit more memory for apps and games than iPhone XR, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 128 GB. The Galaxy Note4 features a little longer battery performance than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a 3220mAh battery size instead of 2942mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.