Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 7.1 Nougat |
| 2018-10-26 | 2018-01-09 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 324 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 10.26 | 8.82 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XR has an overall score of 82, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime's 76.9 score. Apple iPhone XR's design is newer, but heavier and a little bit thicker than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime. Apple iPhone XR has a bit sharper display than Galaxy On7 Prime, because although it has a bit lower 828 x 1792px resolution and a bit lower display density, it also counts with a quite larger screen.
IPhone XR counts with a quite better processing power than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and 2 lesser processing cores , it also counts with a 64 bits CPU. The iPhone XR captures much better photos and videos than Galaxy On7 Prime, because although it has a less MP back camera, it also counts with a larger camera aperture for better low light images, a larger sensor which gives a better image and video quality and a lot better video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime has a way bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Apple iPhone XR, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 256 GB. The Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime has a bit longer battery lifetime than iPhone XR, because it has a 12% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.