Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-10-26 | 2021-03-12 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.3 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LCD |
| 324 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Mali-G52 MP1 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XR is slightly better than Galaxy XCover 5, getting an 82 score against 78.1. Apple iPhone XR's construction is just a little bit thinner than Galaxy XCover 5, but it's somewhat heavier and was released 2 years before. The iPhone XR has a superior hardware performance than Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has less RAM and 2 less processing cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
The Apple iPhone XR counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a bigger display, a little higher 828 x 1792 resolution and a little bit higher pixel density. The iPhone XR captures much better pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has a way less megapixels resolution back camera, and they both have the same aperture, the iPhone XR also counts with a way better (4K) video definition.
The Galaxy XCover 5 counts with a much better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone XR, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the Galaxy XCover 5 also has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 features a battery lifetime that is very similar to the Apple iPhone XR one, although the Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 also has a 2 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.