Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-10-26 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 324 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XR is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, having an 82 score against 81. The Apple iPhone XR construction is somewhat lighter and thinner than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, although it was released a little bit over a year before. Apple iPhone XR features a greater processing power than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has 1 GB less RAM and 2 less processing cores (although faster), it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
The Apple iPhone XR features just a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, although it has a bit lower pixel density, a way worse resolution of 828 x 1792 and a bit smaller screen. IPhone XR features a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture and a back facing camera with much less mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a way bigger sensor which offers a lot better photo and video quality and a lot better (4K) video resolution.
The Galaxy XCover Pro features much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Apple iPhone XR, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a really longer battery duration than iPhone XR, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone XR is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Apple iPhone XR, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.