Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-10-26 | 2021-08-11 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a general score of 85.6, which is a little bit better than Apple iPhone XR's 82 score. Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a incredibly newer device, and it's also somewhat thinner and a bit lighter than Apple iPhone XR. Apple iPhone XR counts with a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a lower number of cores and also slower and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a little sharper screen than iPhone XR, because it has a better 1080 x 2636 resolution, a higher pixels quantity per inch in the screen and a little larger display. IPhone XR takes a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Flip 3. Both have a F1.8 camera aperture and a 12 mega pixels back facing camera.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a much better memory capacity for applications and games than iPhone XR, because it has 64 GB more internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has just a bit better battery lifetime than iPhone XR, because it has a 12% bigger battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it costs more money than the iPhone XR, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as iPhone XR. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy the iPhone XR, and give up a couple features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.