Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-10-26 | 2020-09-18 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a general score of 94.6, which is much better than the iPhone XR's 82 global score. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 body is newer and thinner, but notably heavier than iPhone XR. The iPhone XR has just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has 9 GB less RAM memory and an inferior number of slower cores, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
IPhone XR features just a bit better screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, although it has a little bit smaller screen, a little lower pixel amount per inch of screen and a lot worse resolution of 828 x 1792 pixels. Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a superior storage capacity for apps and games than iPhone XR, because it has 192 GB more internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a much better battery performance than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a 53 percent bigger battery size. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 takes slightly better photographs and videos than iPhone XR, and although they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, the same video resolution, a same resolution back camera and a same size diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a much bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting way better quality photographs and videos.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Apple iPhone XR, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Apple iPhone XR. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Apple iPhone XR, giving up a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.