Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-10-26 | 2021-08-11 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is much better than Apple iPhone XR, with a 90.6 score against 82. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 design is way newer and thinner than the Apple iPhone XR's, but it's much heavier. IPhone XR counts with a little more vivid screen than Galaxy Z Fold 3, although it has a bit less pixels per inch in the display, a bit smaller screen and a way lower resolution of 828 x 1792.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone XR, because it has more internal memory. IPhone XR features just a bit better processing power than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has an inferior number of slower cores and 9 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit processor.
The iPhone XR takes much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have the same resolution back facing camera, the iPhone XR also has a bigger camera aperture. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a very superior battery lifetime than iPhone XR, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.