Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-10-26 | 2020-10-13 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 7.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | Atlantic blue, Pearl gray and Rose gold |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 324 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4820mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XR has a score of 82, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite's general score of 81.2. The iPhone XR construction is just a bit lighter and just a little thinner than the Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, even though it was released 2 years before. Apple iPhone XR has a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, although it has a bit smaller display, a little bit lower screen pixel density and a lot lower resolution of 828 x 1792px.
IPhone XR features a quite superior processing power than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and 2 less cores (although faster), it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit. The Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite counts with a bit better camera than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for capturing photographs and videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite also counts with a way higher resolution camera in the back and a way bigger back camera sensor.
The Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite features as much memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as the iPhone XR one, they have equal internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite has a really longer battery lifetime than iPhone XR, because it has a 64% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.