Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| 2018-10-26 | 2018-04-03 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 324 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a bit better than the Apple iPhone XR, with a score of 83.8 against 82. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s body is just a bit thinner and just a bit lighter than the Apple iPhone XR, although they were released only 7 months apart. The iPhone XR features a little better processing power than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has an inferior number of slower cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
The Apple iPhone XR features just a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a lot lower resolution of 828 x 1792 and a little bit worse pixel density, it also counts with a little bit larger display. IPhone XR takes clearer photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although they both have the same aperture, the same resolution back-facing camera, the same 3840x2160 video definition and a 0.39 inches sensor, the iPhone XR also has higher 60 fps video frame rates.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a very superior storage to install games and applications than iPhone XR, because it has more internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features a bit better battery lifetime than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a 3400mAh battery size.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is also the cheapest, making this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.