Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2018-10-26 | 2023-05-09 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.34 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 SM7475-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 725 GPU |
| 10.26 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XR has an overall score of 82, which is a bit better than Xiaomi Poco F5's 78.2 overall score. Although it's the best in this comparison review, the iPhone XR design is incredibly older, a little heavier and just a bit thicker than Xiaomi Poco F5. IPhone XR counts with a very superior hardware performance than Xiaomi Poco F5, because although it has 2 less cores (although faster) and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
The Xiaomi Poco F5 has a little bit better display than iPhone XR, because it has a little higher screen pixels density, much more display brightness, a better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit bigger display. The Xiaomi Poco F5 has a lot bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than iPhone XR, because it has 192 GB more internal memory.
Xiaomi Poco F5 counts with a superior battery performance than Apple iPhone XR, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2942mAh. IPhone XR takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Poco F5, although it has a camera in the back with lot less MP, they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.