Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-10-26 | 2020-11-27 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | Cool blue, Power black and Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 324 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
IPhone XR is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Poco M3, with a general score of 82 against 78.2. The iPhone XR is an a lot older phone than the Xiaomi Poco M3, but Apple managed to make it a little lighter and somewhat thinner. The iPhone XR features a better performing CPU than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has an inferior number of cores (but faster) and 1 GB less RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
The Apple iPhone XR features a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Poco M3, although it has a little bit smaller display, a much lower resolution of 828 x 1792 and a just a bit less pixels per inch in the screen. The Xiaomi Poco M3 has a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Apple iPhone XR, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Xiaomi Poco M3 also has an external memory slot that admits up to 512 GB.
Xiaomi Poco M3 features a bit better camera than iPhone XR, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have the same camera aperture and the same video definition, the Xiaomi Poco M3 also counts with a much bigger sensor and a back camera with a way better 48 MP resolution. Xiaomi Poco M3 features a very superior battery duration than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a 104 percent larger battery size.
Although iPhone XR is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Xiaomi Poco M3, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Xiaomi Poco M3. If you are trying to save some money, you can get Xiaomi Poco M3, letting go a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.