Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-10-26 | 2020-09-08 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 324 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
IPhone XR is slightly better than the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, getting an 82 score against 81.6. IPhone XR is an older cellphone than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, but it is somewhat thinner and a bit lighter anyway. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a bit sharper display than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has way less brightness, it also counts with a little bit bigger display, a better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little more pixels per inch of screen.
The iPhone XR features just a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has a lower number of cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC shoots much better photographs and videos than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has worse video frame rate and a smaller camera aperture which is not good for capturing photographs and video in low-light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a way bigger back camera sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and photographs and a camera with way more MP.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a much better storage capacity for games and applications than iPhone XR, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a much better battery life than Apple iPhone XR, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.