Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-10-26 | -- |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.44 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 324 pixels per inch | 481 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 810 MT6833 (6 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 has a score of 82.2, which is slightly better than the iPhone XR's general score of 82. Despite being the best in this comparison, Xiaomi Redmi Note 11's body is just a little bit thicker and a little heavier than iPhone XR. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 counts with a slightly better looking screen than iPhone XR, because it has more pixels per inch in the display, a bit bigger display and a lot higher 2080 x 2400 resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 features a much greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than iPhone XR, because it has 128 GB internal memory. IPhone XR features a bit superior processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, because although it has 3 GB lesser RAM and 2 lesser cpu cores , it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 features a very superior battery duration than iPhone XR, because it has a 70% bigger battery capacity. Apple iPhone XR captures a bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, because although it has a back facing camera with a lot worse resolution, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Apple iPhone XR also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a lot higher photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.