Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | ZTE |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-10-26 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XR has a global score of 82, which is slightly better than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro's score of 80.2. Even though the iPhone XR is better than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, we must note that it's also just a bit thicker and a little heavier. Apple iPhone XR features a little sharper screen than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, although it has a much lower 828 x 1792 resolution, a little bit worse pixel density and a bit smaller display.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than iPhone XR, because it has 256 GB internal storage and a SD card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Apple iPhone XR counts with just a bit better performance than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has less and slower processing cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro has improved battery lifetime than Apple iPhone XR, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a better camera than Apple iPhone XR, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has a bigger aperture to capture better photography in poorly lited situations and a back camera with way more mega-pixels.
Although Apple iPhone XR is a better device, it costs more money than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the ZTE Axon 10 Pro. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, and give up a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.