Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | ZTE |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-10-26 | 2020-02-07 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | Black, Ochre and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XR is a little bit better than the ZTE Axon 10s Pro, having an 82 score against 76.6. Even being the best in this comparison review, the Apple iPhone XR body is older, a little bit thicker and a bit heavier than ZTE Axon 10s Pro. The iPhone XR counts with a bit more vivid screen than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, although it has a way worse resolution of 828 x 1792px, a bit smaller screen and a bit inferior count of pixels per screen inch.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro counts with a much greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than iPhone XR, because it has 64 GB more internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. IPhone XR has a bit better CPU than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has an inferior number of cores and they are also slower and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro has better battery lifetime than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity. Apple iPhone XR shoots clearer photographs and videos than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a lot lower 12 MP resolution back-facing camera, a tinier aperture and a way smaller sensor providing a much worse image quality, it also counts with a lot better (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.