Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | ZTE |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-10-26 | 2020-03-30 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 17.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XR is a little bit better than the ZTE Axon 11, having an 82 score against 76. The iPhone XR design is older, a little bit thicker and heavier than ZTE Axon 11. IPhone XR counts with just a bit better performance than ZTE Axon 11, because although it has lesser RAM and less cpu cores , it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
The Apple iPhone XR counts with a little sharper display than ZTE Axon 11, although it has a little bit smaller display, a way worse 828 x 1792 resolution and a little lower screen pixel density. The iPhone XR has just a bit better camera than ZTE Axon 11, because although it has a back facing camera with a way lower resolution and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better low-light photos and videos.
ZTE Axon 11 has a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than iPhone XR, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 2 TB and 128 GB internal storage. ZTE Axon 11 counts with improved battery lifetime than iPhone XR, because it has a 36% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.