Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | ZTE |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-10-26 | 2020-12-21 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.78 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | $ 449.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 389 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4220mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XR has a general score of 82, which is a little bit better than ZTE Axon 20's 77.8 global score. Despite of the fact the Apple iPhone XR is notably older and a little thicker than ZTE Axon 20, it's design is still a little bit lighter. Apple iPhone XR counts with just a little better hardware performance than ZTE Axon 20, because although it has 5 GB lesser RAM memory and a lower number of cores (although faster), it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
Apple iPhone XR features a bit sharper screen than ZTE Axon 20, although it has a bit smaller display, a just a bit less pixels per inch of display and a way lower resolution of 828 x 1792. ZTE Axon 20 has a much better camera than iPhone XR, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for low-light photography and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, the ZTE Axon 20 also counts with a lot larger back camera sensor providing a way better image quality and a camera with lot more megapixels.
ZTE Axon 20 features a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than iPhone XR, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity. The ZTE Axon 20 counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a 43 percent bigger battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone XR is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the ZTE Axon 20, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the ZTE Axon 20. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Apple iPhone XR, but if you don't you can save some money and get the ZTE Axon 20, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.